Antony Flew on Religious Language

Think 22 (65):11-16 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Here's an overview of one of the more ingenious attempts to criticize religious belief. Antony Flew argues that if the religious won't allow anything to count as evidence against what they believe, then they don't actually believe anything. The religious aren't making false claims; rather, they're not making any claims at all.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,532

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Antony Flew on Christian Theism: A Critique.Constancio C. Amen - 1986 - Dissertation, University of Dallas
The Falsification Challenge.J. Kellenberger - 1969 - Religious Studies 5 (1):69 - 76.
Theology and falsification.Antony Flew & Basil Mitchell - 2000 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring Philosophy: An Introductory Anthology. New York, NY, United States of America: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 28-29.
God and philosophy.Antony Flew - 1984 - New York: Prometheus Books.
God and Philosophy. [REVIEW]Andrew Lugg - 2005 - Philosophy in Review 25:355-356.
God and the big bang.Antony Flew - 2003 - Think 2 (4):17-23.
Philosophical Essays.Antony Flew & John Shosky - 1998 - Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-09

Downloads
16 (#899,933)

6 months
11 (#231,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references