Flawed kinematic models cannot provide insight into the nature of motor variability

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):314-315 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Plamondon & Alimi's derivation of the kinematic model is mathematically flawed. By simply naming a particular parameter combination the model fails to explicate the sources of variability. As a result, the model cannot distinguish between various sources of error, such as those resulting from task demands and those resulting from movement execution

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,410

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The role of working memory in skilled and conceptual thought.Thomas Wynn & Fred Coolidge - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (6):703-704.
Computational motor planning and the theory of event coding.David A. Rosenbaum - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):902-903.
Shedding computational light on human creativity.Subrata Dasgupta - 2008 - Perspectives on Science 16 (2):pp. 121-136.
Evolutionary internalized regularities.Robert Schwartz - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (4):626-628.
Mental simulation and motor imagery.Gregory Currie & Ian Ravenscroft - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (1):161-80.
Leibniz's Optics and Contingency in Nature.Jeffrey K. McDonough - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (4):432-455.
Kinematic models cannot provide insight into motor control.Arnold B. Mitnitski - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (2):318-319.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
8 (#1,324,543)

6 months
3 (#984,838)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references