Enthymemathical proofs and canonical proofs in Euclid's plane geometry

In Claudio Bartocci (ed.), The Philosophers and Mathematics. Springer Verlag. pp. 127-144 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Since the application of Postulate I.2 in Euclid's Elements is not uniform, one could wonder in what way should it be applied in Euclid's plane geometry. Besides legitimizing questions like this from the perspective of a philosophy of mathematical practice, we sketch a general perspective of conceptual analysis of mathematical texts, which involves an extended notion of mathematical theory as system of authorizations, and an audience-dependent notion of proof.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Proofs, pictures, and Euclid.John Mumma - 2010 - Synthese 175 (2):255 - 287.
The surveyability of long proofs.Edwin Coleman - 2009 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):27-43.
Visual imagery and geometric enthymeme: The example of euclid I.Keith K. Niall - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):202-203.
Arguing Around Mathematical Proofs.Michel Dufour - 2013 - In Andrew Aberdein & Ian J. Dove (eds.), The Argument of Mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 61-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-26

Downloads
12 (#1,090,149)

6 months
7 (#439,760)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Panza
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references