Inward internationalisation

Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Duties to address global injustices face a large motivation gap, particularly amongst those populations most capable of bearing the financial burdens of fulfiling them. This motivation gap is explained, at least in part, by the structure of the state system, which facilitates group identification with fellow citizens to a greater extent than with outsiders. This structural feature of the state system gives states little incentive to further the cause of global justice. Yet, given that states are the most powerful actors on the global stage today, a more just global order is likely predicated upon the development of more just states. In light of these realities, in this paper I make the case for an approach to furthering global justice which i call inward internationalisation. Inward internationalisation calls for the initially modest structural transformation of domestic states, so as to make domestic governments and their constituents increasingly sensitive to their international obligations. Inward internationalisation involves states giving a public, formal, and institutionalised voice within their own domestic deliberations to other states' representatives. This serves informational, expressive, and dynamic functions. After outlining these functions, thereby showing the attraction of inward internationalisation, I argue for the strategic accessibility of inward internationalisation as a path to reform, by outlining the dynamics which might cause inward internationalisation to spread as a norm of governance amongst states.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Social Equality and the Global Society.Pierre Cloarec - 2017 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 14 (5):535-561.
Cosmopolitanism, Motivation, and Normative Feasibility.Lior Erez - 2015 - Ethics and Global Politics 8 (1):43-55.
Justice and morality beyond naïve cosmopolitanism.Lea Ypi - 2010 - Ethics and Global Politics 3 (3):171-192.
Cosmopolitanism and distributing responsibilities.Thom Brooks - 2002 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 5 (3):92-97.
Accountability and Global Governance: The Case of Iraq.Joy Gordon - 2006 - Ethics and International Affairs 20 (1):79-98.
Cosmopolitanism: ideals and realities.David Held - 2010 - Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Liberal internationalism and global social justice.Kostas Koukouzelis - 2009 - Journal of Global Ethics 5 (2):97-108.
Reconsidering the state: cosmopolitanism, republicanism and global governance.Steven Slaughter - 2010 - In Stan van Hooft & Wim Vandekerckhove (eds.), Questioning Cosmopolitanism. Springer. pp. 183--198.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-24

Downloads
34 (#481,212)

6 months
9 (#349,017)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tadhg Ó Laoghaire
Keele University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
World Poverty and Human Rights.Thomas Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):1-7.
Virtue signalling is virtuous.Neil Levy - 2020 - Synthese 198 (10):9545-9562.
The View from Nowhere.Thomas Nagel - 1986 - Ethics 98 (1):137-157.
Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives.Robert E. Goodin - 2007 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 35 (1):40–68.

View all 17 references / Add more references