Does language embody a philosophical point of view?

Review of Metaphysics 14 (4):617-636 (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Examining the sapir-Whorf hypothesis, The author addresses the questions whether language affects perception and whether grammatical categories affect conceptual categories. He argues that advocates of linguistic relativity have attributed to language an unjustified degree of causal efficacy and that linguistic idealism is contradicted by the results of experimental psychology. Then, Considering the claimed correlation between grammatical and conceptual categories, He argues that grammar has no metaphysics and does not influence thought. The author concludes that language in use embodies a point of view only in the weak sense that relations and distinctions implicit in necessary concepts constitute a philosophical theory about reality. (staff)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#411,404)

6 months
4 (#798,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Charles Landesman
Yale University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references