ChatGPT, The CUPID Model, and Low-Stakes Writing

Aapt Studies in Pedagogy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Educators are increasingly concerned with the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in student writing. Much of the concern focuses on the issue of students using ChatGPT to complete their work. I introduce the CUPID model for instructors to use when thinking about how to pedagogically handle ChatGPT. The CUPID model lays out five general approaches: Catch, Utilize, Prevent, Ignore, and Disincentivize. I suggest that instructors should especially consider using certain assignments that fall under the approach “Disincentivize”. Philosophy instructors in particular should assign more low-stakes writing, such as journals and reflection pieces. The adoption of low-stakes writing assignments aims to discourage students from relying on AI while promoting clarity of thought and deeper engagement with philosophical ideas.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The philosophy student writer's manual.Anthony Graybosch, Gregory M. Scott & Stephen M. Garrison - 2014 - Boston: Pearson. Edited by Gregory M. Scott & Stephen M. Garrison.
Tlön, Uqbar, ChatGPT.George Estreich - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy of Disability 3:179-190.
Reflection In The Writing Classroom.Kathleen Yancey - 1998 - Utah State University Press.
The Activity of “Writing for Learning” in a Nursing Program.Line Wittek - 2013 - Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 14 (1):73 - 94.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-11-16

Downloads
161 (#119,365)

6 months
145 (#24,066)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Casey Landers
Texas State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A Philosophical Response to Plagiarism.Joel Hubick - 2016 - Teaching Philosophy 39 (4):453-481.

Add more references