Radical explanations, but trivial descriptions

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):842-843 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A thorough distinction between explanatory and descriptive concepts reveals a radical explanatory and a trivial descriptive doctrine in current neuroscientific research. The explanatory approach examines the neuronal substrates of the mind, whereas the descriptive one deals only with its correlates.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Neuroscience and the explanation of psychological phenomena.Antti Revonsuo - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):847-849.
Interpreting neuroscience and explaining the mind.Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):856-866.
Taking the trivial doctrine seriously: Functionalism, eliminativism, and materialism.Maurizio Tirassa - 1999 - Tirassa, Maurizio (1999) Taking the Trivial Doctrine Seriously 22 (5):851-852.
The nontrivial doctrine of cognitive neuroscience.Valerie Gray Hardcastle - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-839.
How trivial is the “trivial neuron doctrine”?Steven G. Daniel - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):834-835.
Holistic explanations of events.Aviezer Tucker - 2004 - Philosophy 79 (4):573-589.
The “trivial neuron doctrine” is not trivial.Dale Jamieson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):841-842.
Neuron doctrine: Trivial versus radical versus do not dichotomize.Barry Horwitz - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):839-840.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#711,593)

6 months
2 (#1,203,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references