Good and bad points in scales

Archive for Mathematical Logic 53 (7-8):749-777 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We address three questions raised by Cummings and Foreman regarding a model of Gitik and Sharon. We first analyze the PCF-theoretic structure of the Gitik–Sharon model, determining the extent of good and bad scales. We then classify the bad points of the bad scales existing in both the Gitik–Sharon model and other models containing bad scales. Finally, we investigate the ideal of subsets of singular cardinals of countable cofinality carrying good scales.

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s00153-014-0387-6

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Magnitude scales, category scales, and number scales.Stanley J. Rule - 1989 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12 (2):288-288.
Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua.S. S. Stevens & E. H. Galanter - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (6):377.
Good citizens and moral heroes.Adam Morton - 2009 - In Pedro Alexis Tabensky (ed.), The positive function of evil. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
[Omnibus Review].Thomas Jech - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):261-262.
Religiosity Scales: What Are We Measuring in Whom?Marsha Cutting & Michelle Walsh - 2008 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion 30 (1):137-153.
Religiosity Scales: What Are We Measuring in Whom?Marsha Cutting & Michelle Walsh - 2008 - Archive for the Psychology of Religion / Archiv für Religionspychologie 30 (1):137-153.
Weight scales from ratio judgments and comparisons of existent weight scales.Katherine E. Baker & Frank J. Dudek - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 50 (5):293.
Relation of sensory scales to physical scales.Richard M. Warren - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (3):586-587.
Rational order in tone scales and cone scales.Albert van der Schoot - 1999 - Filozofski Vestnik 20 (S2):191-200.
Darwin's Philosophical Legacy: The Good and the Not-so-Good.Gerard M. Verschuuren - 2012 - Lexington Books.
An IRT Analysis of Motive Questionnaires: The Unified Motive Scales.Felix D. Schönbrodt & Friederike X. R. Gerstenberg - unknown
Types of degrees and types of event structures.David Nicolas & Patrick Caudal - 2005 - In Maienborn Claudia & Wöllstein Angelika (eds.), Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications. Mouton de Gruyter. pp. 277-300.
Unification of the State with the Dynamical Law.Lee Smolin - 2015 - Foundations of Physics 45 (1):1-10.
Extensive measurement and ratio functions.Brent Mundy - 1988 - Synthese 75 (1):1 - 23.
Scales of minimal complexity in \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${K(\mathbb{R})}$$\end{document}. [REVIEW]Daniel W. Cunningham - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):319-351.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
20 (#769,678)

6 months
6 (#526,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Squares, scales and stationary reflection.James Cummings, Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 2001 - Journal of Mathematical Logic 1 (01):35-98.
A very weak square principle.Matthew Foreman & Menachem Magidor - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (1):175-196.
Diagonal Prikry extensions.James Cummings & Matthew Foreman - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (4):1383-1402.

View all 7 references / Add more references