Danish ethics council rejects brain death as the criterion of death -- commentary 1: wanting it both ways

Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (1):8-9 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary on the recommendations of the Danish Council of Ethics (DCE) concerning criteria for death it is argued that whilst the DCE is correct in stressing the cultural aspects of death, its adoption of cardiac-oriented criteria raises several problems. There are problems with its notion of a 'death process', which purportedly begins with brain death and ends with cessation of cardiac function, and there are serious problems regarding its commitment to a cardiac-oriented definition whilst permitting transplantation when the heart is still beating

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Brain Death and the US President's Council on Bioethics.Kevin McGovern - 2009 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 14 (4):9.
The conservative use of the brain-death criterion – a critique.Tom Tomlinson - 1984 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 9 (4):377-394.
Death and philosophy.Jeff Malpas & Robert C. Solomon (eds.) - 1998 - New York: Routledge.
Brain death without definitions.Winston Chiong - 2005 - Hastings Center Report 35 (6):20-30.
Cerebral death.Eike-Henner W. Kluge - 1984 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 5 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
69 (#238,416)

6 months
2 (#1,206,222)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Death in Denmark: a reply.D. Lamb - 1991 - Journal of Medical Ethics 17 (2):100-101.
Criteria of death.A. M. Capron - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (3):167-167.
Death and reductionism: a reply to John F Catherwood.D. Lamb - 1992 - Journal of Medical Ethics 18 (1):40-42.

Add more citations