Baby Fae: a beastly business

Journal of Medical Ethics 11 (4):178-183 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The Baby Fae experiment has highlighted the growing trend in medicine of using animal parts in the treatment of humans. This paper raises the question of the logical and moral justification for these current practices and their proposed expansion. We argue that the Cognitive Capacity Principle establishes morally justified necessary and sufficient conditions for the use of non-human animals in medical treatments and research. Some alternative sources for medical uses are explored as well as some possible programmes for their implementation

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,991

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Utility of Basic Animal Research.Larry Carbone - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (s1):12-15.
Research, Ethics, and Baby Fae.Thomas E. Cargill - 1984 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (6):234-234.
Research, Ethics, and Baby Fae.Thomas E. Cargill - 1984 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (6):234-234.
The NIH report of its review of the Baby Fae case.F. W. Dommel - 1986 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 8 (2):1.
Necessary Conditions for Morally Responsible Animal Research.David Degrazia & Jeff Sebo - 2015 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24 (4):420-430.
Speciesism and Loyalty.Mark Bernstein - 1991 - Behavior and Philosophy 19 (1):43 - 59.
Suffering for Science and How Science Supports the End of Animal Experiments.Aysha Akhtar - 2018 - In Andrew Linzey & Clair Linzey (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Practical Animal Ethics. London: Palgrave Macmillan Uk. pp. 475-491.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
230 (#90,955)

6 months
9 (#356,105)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

A Small, Good Thing – Anencephalic Organ Donation.David A. Buehler - 1993 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 2 (1):81.
When Do Organs Become “Spare Parts”?Thomasine Kushner - 1992 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1 (4):349.

Add more citations

References found in this work

On the distinction between disease and illness.Christopher Boorse - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 5 (1):49-68.
Ideology and etiology.H. Tristram Engelhardt Jr - 1976 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (3):256-268.
The concept of disease.Joseph Margolis - 1976 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 1 (3):238-255.

Add more references