Memory of titoism: Hegemony frameworks

Filozofija I Društvo 21 (2):225-250 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

U radu se analizira slika danasnjeg hegemonog secanja na titoizam. Prikazane su raznovrsne instrumentalne redukcije u domacoj kulturi secanja koje obuhvataju demonizacije i negativne simbolizacije titoizma. Blize su razmotreni raznovrsni mitovi i ideologizacije kod pamcenja titoizma, zatim cinioci selektivnog secanja i novi sklop secanja na titoizam. Uoceno je da su privatizacija i retradicionalizacija glavni cinioci kreiranja novih okvira za pamcenje socijalizma i za novu negativnu simbolizaciju titoizma.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Beyond Titoism.S. Zukin - 1980 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1980 (44):5-24.
Risdon Vale: Place, memory, and suburban experience.Kate Booth - 2008 - Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (3):299 – 311.
Memory and materiality.Katrina Schlunke - 2013 - Memory Studies 6:253-261.
Is memory a natural kind?Kourken Michaelian - 2011 - Memory Studies 4 (2):170-189.
Memory systems of 1999.Daniel L. Schacter, Anthony D. Wagner & Randy L. Buckner - 2000 - In Tulving Endel & Craik Fergus I. M. (eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-17

Downloads
17 (#872,959)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references