Engineering affect: emotion regulation, the internet, and the techno-social niche

Philosophical Topics 47 (2):205-231 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Philosophical work exploring the relation between cognition and the Internet is now an active area of research. Some adopt an externalist framework, arguing that the Internet should be seen as environmental scaffolding that drives and shapes cognition. However, despite growing interest in this topic, little attention has been paid to how the Internet influences our affective life — our moods, emotions, and our ability to regulate these and other feeling states. We argue that the Internet scaffolds not only cognition but also affect. Using various case studies, we consider some ways that we are increasingly dependent on our Internet-enabled “techno-social niches” to regulate the contours of our own affective life and participate in the affective lives of others. We argue further that, unlike many of the other environmental resources we use to regulate affect, the Internet has distinct properties that introduce new dimensions of complexity to these regulative processes. First, it is radically social in a way many of these other resources are not. Second, it is a radically distributed and decentralized resource; no one individual or agent is responsible for the Internet’s content or its affective impact on users. Accordingly, while the Internet can profoundly augment and enrich our affective life and deepen our connection with others, there is also a distinctive kind of affective precarity built into our online endeavors as well.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What is so bad about internet content regulation?John Weckert - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (2):105-111.
Four Phases of Internet Regulation.John Palfrey - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (2):981-996.
Four phases of internet regulation.John Palfrey - 2010 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 77 (3):981-996.
The affective 'we': Self-regulation and shared emotions.Joel Krueger - 2015 - In Thomas Szanto & Dermot Moran (eds.), Phenomenology of Sociality: Discovering the ‘We’. New York: Routledge. pp. 263-277.
The Internet and Research: Explanation and Resources.David Allie - 1995 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 16 (4):339-368.
Extended cognition and the explosion of knowledge.David Ludwig - 2014 - Philosophical Psychology (3):1-14.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-13

Downloads
611 (#28,411)

6 months
195 (#14,635)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Joel Krueger
University of Exeter
Lucy Osler
Cardiff University

Citations of this work

Communing with the Dead Online: Chatbots, Grief, and Continuing Bonds.Joel Krueger & Lucy Osler - 2022 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 29 (9-10):222-252.
Taking empathy online.Lucy Osler - 2021 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Affordances and spatial agency in psychopathology.Joel Krueger - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.

View all 42 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Scaffoldings of the affective mind.Giovanna Colombetti & Joel Krueger - 2015 - Philosophical Psychology 28 (8):1157-1176.
You, Me, and We: The Sharing of Emotional Experiences.D. Zahavi - 2015 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (1-2):84-101.
Minds: extended or scaffolded?Kim Sterelny - 2010 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):465-481.

View all 25 references / Add more references