A method of modelling the formalism of set theory in axiomatic set theory

Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (1):20-34 (1963)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As is well known, some paradoxes arise through inadequate analysis of the meanings of terms in a language, an adequate analysis showing that the paradoxes arise through a lack of separation of an object theory and a metatheory. Under such an adequate analysis in which parts of the metatheory are modelled in the object theory, the paradoxes give way to remarkable theorems establishing limitations of the object theory.Such a modelling is often accomplished by a Gödel numbering. Here we shall use a somewhat different technique in axiomatic set theory, from which we shall reap a few results having the effect of comparing the strength of various axiom schema of comprehension for sets and classes. Similar results were obtained by A. Mostowski [7] using Gödel numbering.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#714,863)

6 months
4 (#799,256)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Incompleteness Via Paradox and Completeness.Walter Dean - 2020 - Review of Symbolic Logic 13 (3):541-592.
The spectrum of elementary embeddings j: V→ V.Paul Corazza - 2006 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 139 (1):327-399.
Consistency results about ordinal definability.Kenneth McAloon - 1971 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 2 (4):449.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references