Conceptual implications of kinship terminological systems: Special problems and multiple analytic approaches

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (5):390-390 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I raise issues concerning Jones' Seneca analysis, its relationship to analyses of Dravidian-, Crow-, and Omaha-type systems. These affect the convincingness of his kinship study, and thus the wider conclusions that he wants to draw regarding human cognition and language.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Problems of reproducibility in complex mind-matter systems.Harald Atmanspacher - 2003 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 17 (2):243-270.
Conceptual and Derivation Systems.Jiří Raclavský & Petr Kuchyňka - 2011 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 20 (1-2):159-174.
Analyticity and conceptual revision.Milton Fisk - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (20):627-637.
Polysemy: theoretical and computational approaches.Yael Ravin & Claudia Leacock (eds.) - 2000 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Addendum.S. B. W. - 1966 - The Classical Review 16 (3):270-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
24 (#659,238)

6 months
9 (#313,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references