Wittgenstein’s Four-Stroke Faces and the Idea of Visual Philosophy

Wittgenstein-Studien 11 (1):31-52 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the paper the author explores the question ‘Did Wittgenstein (re)invent emoticons?’ in three sub-questions. What did he draw and for which purposes? What are emoticons? Are there similarities and differences between his drawings and emoticons? The answers are following. Wittgenstein has drawn faces from the 1930s to the 1940s which are graphically and by use like emoticons. He presented a philosophical problem of interpretation of faces. Emoticons as made of written and typed punctuation marks or as drawings were invented and used centuries before the 1930s, but common and popular use started in the 1960s. Previous inventions were probably unknown to Wittgenstein, and his faces probably didn’t influence later inventions. His faces and emoticons are graphically similar and made with the similar purposes. Differences are that he only used drawings and never written or typed punctuation marks, and he used them to deal with problems of emotions and perception (similar to his problems of the duck-rabbit head). These answers are connected to available textual and interpretative evidence, interpretations are given in propositions from (a) to (p), and summarized in the conclusion (r). Some consequences of visual thinking on philosophical thinking are also drawn in terms of a future research.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emoticons.Maja Katarina Tomic, Marijana Martinez & Tedo Vrbanec - 2013 - Fip: Journal of Finance and Law 1 (1):35-42.
The significance of jewishness for Wittgenstein's philosophy.David G. Stern - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (4):383 – 401.
Are faces special?Elinor McKone & Rachel Robbins - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 149--176.
Wittgenstein and Scepticism.Denis McManus (ed.) - 2003 - New York: Routledge.
Language, the World and Spontaneity in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus.Marc Joseph - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:89-95.
Wittgenstein and Family Concepts.Odai Al Zoubi - 2016 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 5 (1):31-54.
Steadily Cubic.Kristijan Krkač - 2020 - Disputatio Philosophica 21 (1):47-66.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-05-01

Downloads
10 (#1,218,872)

6 months
3 (#1,042,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

What’s the Point of Seeing Aspects?Avner Baz - 2000 - Philosophical Investigations 23 (2):97–121.
Perceptual Experience and Seeing-as.Daniel Enrique Kalpokas - 2015 - Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1):123-144.
Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Science.Vasso Kindi - 2017 - In Hans-Johann Glock & John Hyman (eds.), A Companion to Wittgenstein. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 587–602.
Wittgenstein’s Dubbit III.Kristijan Krkač - 2010 - Wittgenstein-Studien 1 (1):121-150.

Add more references