Quantifying over propositions in relevance logic: nonaxiomatisability of primary interpretations of ∀ p and ∃ _p_

Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):334-349 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A typical approach to semantics for relevance (and other) logics: specify a class of algebraic structures and take amodelto be one of these structures, α, together with some function or relation which associates with every formulaAa subset ofα. (This is the approach of, among others, Urquhart, Routley and Meyer and Fine.) In some cases there are restrictions on the class of subsets of α with which a formula can be associated: for example, in the semantics of Routley and Meyer [1973], a formula can only be associated with subsets which are closed upwards. It is natural to take apropositionof α to be such a subset of α, and, further, to take the propositional quantifiers to range over these propositions. (Routley and Meyer [1973] explicitly consider this interpretation.) Given such an algebraic semantics, we call (following Routley and Meyer [1973], who follow Henkin [1950]) the above-described interpretation of the quantifiers theprimaryinterpretation associated with the semantics.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dynamic Modalities.Dimiter Vakarelov - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (1-2):385-397.
Some remarks on category of the real line.Kyriakos Keremedis - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (3):153-162.
A small reflection principle for bounded arithmetic.Rineke Verbrugge & Albert Visser - 1994 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (3):785-812.
Lifting independence results in bounded arithmetic.Mario Chiari & Jan Krajíček - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (2):123-138.
Epistemic Operators in Dependence Logic.Pietro Galliani - 2013 - Studia Logica 101 (2):367-397.
Relevant identity.Philip Kremer - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (2):199-222.
Decisive creatures and large continuum.Jakob Kellner & Saharon Shelah - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (1):73-104.
Fragments of Heyting arithmetic.Wolfgang Burr - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1223-1240.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
72 (#231,951)

6 months
13 (#215,089)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Philip Kremer
University of Toronto at Scarborough

Citations of this work

Propositional Quantification in Bimodal S5.Peter Fritz - 2020 - Erkenntnis 85 (2):455-465.
Recent Work in Relevant Logic.Mark Jago - 2013 - Analysis 73 (3):526-541.
A Note on Algebraic Semantics for S5 with Propositional Quantifiers.Wesley H. Holliday - 2019 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 60 (2):311-332.
Logics for propositional contingentism.Peter Fritz - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (2):203-236.
Expressivity of second order propositional modal logic.Balder ten Cate - 2006 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 35 (2):209-223.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity.[author unknown] - 1975 - Studia Logica 54 (2):261-266.
Introduction to mathematical logic.Alonso Church - 1958 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 63 (1):118-118.
Propositional quantifiers in modal logic.Kit Fine - 1970 - Theoria 36 (3):336-346.
The semantics of entailment — III.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (2):192 - 208.
The semantics of entailment II.Richard Routley & Robert K. Meyer - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (1):53 - 73.

View all 9 references / Add more references