G. Klima: Nulla virtus cognoscitiva circa proprium obiectum decipitur

Abstract

Robert Pasnau’s paper presents a strong thesis, which it does not manage to substantiate. The thesis in question is that the Aristotelian doctrine of the identity of the knower and the known, as interpreted by St. Thomas, cannot possibly be used to fend off skepticism.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

My notes

Similar books and articles

Comments on Klima, contemporary "essentialism" vs. aristotelian essentialism.Michael Kremer - manuscript
Conceptual Closure in Anselm's Proof.Tony Roark - 2003 - History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (1):1-14.
ABSTRACT: The identity of knower and known.Gyula Klima - manuscript
Contemporary "essentialism" vs. aristotelian essentialism.Gyula Klima - manuscript
Aquinas on Mind. [REVIEW]Gyula Klima - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (1):113-117.
Libellus pro sapiente.Gyula Klima - 1984 - New Scholasticism 58 (2):207-219.
Francis of marchia, virtus derelicta, and modifications of the basic principles of aristotelian physics.Fabio Zanin - 2006 - Vivarium 44 (1):81-95.
Sophistaria sive summa communium distinctionum circa sophismata accidentium (review).Gyula Klima - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):272-273.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#460,302)

6 months
1 (#1,478,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gyula Klima
Fordham University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references