Does Frege have too many thoughts? A Cantorian problem revisited.

Analysis 65 (1):45–49 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper continues a thread in Analysis begun by Adam Rieger and Nicholas Denyer. Rieger argued that Frege’s theory of thoughts violates Cantor’s theorem by postulating as many thoughts as concepts. Denyer countered that Rieger’s construction could not show that the thoughts generated are always distinct for distinct concepts. By focusing on universally quantified thoughts, rather than thoughts that attribute a concept to an individual, I give a different construction that avoids Denyer’s problem. I also note that this problem for Frege’s philosophy was discovered by Bertrand Russell as early as 1902 and has been discussed intermittently since.

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
424 (#46,800)

6 months
89 (#52,445)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kevin Klement
University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Citations of this work

Reality is not structured.Jeremy Goodman - 2017 - Analysis 77 (1):43–53.
Yablo Without Gödel.Volker Halbach & Shuoying Zhang - 2017 - Analysis 77 (1):53-59.
The senses of functions in the logic of sense and denotation.Kevin C. Klement - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):153-188.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Cambridge, England: Allen & Unwin.
Posthumous Writings.Gottlob Frege (ed.) - 1979 - Blackwell.
The Principles of Mathematics.Bertrand Russell - 1903 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 11 (4):11-12.

View all 12 references / Add more references