Reply to Juliusz Jablecki, "Defending Advertising" (Spring 2008): The Connection between Advertising and Objectivist Epistemology

Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 9 (2):351 - 355 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kirkpatrick responds to "minor shortcomings" discussed in Juliusz Jablecki's review of In Defense of Advertising ("Defending Advertising"). The main issue is the need to delve deeply into the Objectivist ethics and epistemology in order to defend the very applied and concrete discipline of advertising. Kirkpatrick expands on this need and then briefly addresses additional minor complaints mentioned in the generally positive review

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,323

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending Advertising. [REVIEW]Juliusz Jablecki - 2008 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 9 (2):341 - 349.
The advertising industry's defense of its first amendment rights.John H. Crowley - 1993 - Journal of Mass Media Ethics 8 (1):5 – 16.
In defense of advertising: A social perspective. [REVIEW]Barbara J. Phillips - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (2):109-118.
Towards a new paradigm in the ethics of women's advertising.John Alan Cohan - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):323 - 337.
Persuasive advertising, autonomy, and the creation of desire.Roger Crisp - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (5):413 - 418.
The making of self and world in advertising.John Waide - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (2):73 - 79.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-09-29

Downloads
6 (#1,466,578)

6 months
4 (#798,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references