Historical insights on miracles: Babbage, Hume, Aquinas [Book Review]

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 13 (4):209 - 218 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

CHARLES BABBAGE, OUTSTANDING 19TH CENTURY FIGURE ON THEORY OF COMPUTING, URGES ON PROTO-GOODMANIAN AND NEO-MAIMONIDEAN GROUNDS THAT HUME IS QUITE WRONG ABOUT THE PROBABILITY OF MIRACLES’ OCCURRING. AQUINAS’ CLASSIFICATIONS OF MIRACLES INDICATE THAT NOT SINGLE PROBABILITY JUDGMENT IS ALWAYS RIGHT. BABBAGE’S WORK ON COMPUTING STILL CIRCULATES, BUT HIS NINTH BRIDGEWATER TREATISE (ON MIRACLES) HAS LONG DESERVED REPUBLICATION

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#312,925)

6 months
8 (#407,549)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Miracles.Michael Levine - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity: Lectures Given to the Princeton University Philosophy Colloquium.Saul A. Kripke - 1980 - Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Edited by Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.

Add more references