Nocebo effects from clinical notes: reason for action, not opposition for clinicians of patients with medically unexplained symptoms

Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (1):24-25 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In her paper, ‘Sharing online clinical notes with patients: implications for nocebo effects and health equity’, Blease bridges findings from two research fields to describe possible unintended consequences of providing patients access to clinical notes. 1 She explains how nocebo effects, genuine psychological and physiological reactions following negative expectations, may arise after patients read such notes. Blease emphasises that the likelihood of nocebo may be greater for those patient groups who experience stigmatisation in healthcare. We argue that this is the case for patients with so-called medically unexplained symptoms (MUSs) and that clinicians who work with them should consider nocebo but not for the reasons they may think. MUS is a term used to refer to persistent physical symptoms which cannot be fully or reliably attributed to a structural pathology. They include common symptoms such as chronic or recurrent pain in joints and muscles, fatigue, paresthesia or digestive...

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,369

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nocebos and the Psychic Life of Biopower.Ada S. Jaarsma & Suze G. Berkhout - 2019 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 23 (2):67-93.
The Nocebo Effect of Informed Consent.Shlomo Cohen - 2012 - Bioethics 28 (3):147-154.
Harm, Truth, and the Nocebo Effect.Dien Ho - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (2):236-245.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-21

Downloads
15 (#953,086)

6 months
12 (#222,470)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?