A Nonlinear View of Scientific Progression: A Reevaluation of Kaposy's Supposed Obligation

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 1 (4):47-49 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ideal Ethical Standards for Contraceptive Use.Francoise Baylis & Chris Kaposy - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (2):19-20.
Fair Play: Resolving the Crito - Apology Problem.Jonathan Hecht - 2011 - History of Political Thought 32 (4):543-564.
Self-improvement: an essay in Kantian ethics.Robert N. Johnson - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonlinear Paradigm in Multivariate-Integral World Perception and World View.S. M. Vovk - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:837-843.
What Does ‘Legal Obligation’ Mean?Daniel Wodak - 2018 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 99 (4):790-816.
Latour's Thick Concepts.Chris Kaposy - 2002 - Philosophy Today 46 (Supplement):34-41.
Obligation and consent.H. Lesser - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (4):195-196.
Hobbes.James E. Napier - 1992 - Social Philosophy Today 7:283-297.
What Scientific Theories Could Not Be.Hans Halvorson - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (2):183-206.
Divine Will Theory: Desires or Intentions?Christian Miller - 2013 - In L. Kvanvig Jonathan (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
15 (#972,895)

6 months
6 (#585,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Does the distinction between normal and revolutionary science hold water?Stephen Toulmin - 1970 - In Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. pp. 39--47.

Add more references