Ordinals vs. Cardinals in ℕ and Beyond

In Carl Posy & Yemima Ben-Menahem (eds.), Mathematical Knowledge, Objects and Applications: Essays in Memory of Mark Steiner. Springer. pp. 193-225 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ordinality and cardinality, in the finite domain, are ordinarily considered as mere aspects of the very same objects, the natural numbers. Yet Steiner (Mathematics – application and applicability. In: Shapiro S (ed) The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press, 2005) draws attention to the intricate interplay between them, which is made implicit by this conception of them. In this chapter, I present a fitting cognitive framework and use it to account for how this situation comes to be. The framework concerns basic principles of object representation in the cognitive system, and particularly when and how different “aspects” of objects come, developmentally, to be integrated into a deeper, combined representation. Our coming to master the natural numbers is then presented as the process of such integration of ordinals and cardinals, based on their well-behaved interaction in the finite domain. This regular connection in the finite domain between ordinality and cardinality, however, is grasped automatically by the cognitive system as a statistical pattern rather than being stated explicitly, mathematically. Philosophically, this case study thus serves as a warning against ignoring cognition’s inner workings. The upshot is a novel, cognitively motivated account of the natural numbers.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Successors of singular cardinals and coloring theorems I.Todd Eisworth & Saharon Shelah - 2005 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 44 (5):597-618.
Characterizing strong compactness via strongness.Arthur W. Apter - 2003 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 49 (4):375.
C(n)-cardinals.Joan Bagaria - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (3-4):213-240.
A diamond-plus principle consistent with AD.Daniel W. Cunningham - 2020 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 59 (5-6):755-775.
A Covering Lemma for HOD of K (ℝ).Daniel W. Cunningham - 2010 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (4):427-442.
Stretchings.O. Finkel & J. P. Ressayre - 1996 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 61 (2):563-585.
The model N = ∪ {L[A]: A countable set of ordinals}.Claude Sureson - 1987 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 36:289-313.
Antireductionism and Ordinals.Beau Madison Mount - 2019 - Philosophia Mathematica 27 (1):105-124.
The largest countable inductive set is a mouse set.Mitch Rudominer - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):443-459.
On ^|^alefsym;0-Complete Cardinals and ^|^Pi;11-Class of Ordinals.Kanji Namba - 1967 - Annals of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science 3 (2):77-86.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-06-13

Downloads
15 (#952,044)

6 months
12 (#220,388)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aviv Keren
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references