Analysis of scientific truth status in controlled rehabilitation trials

, , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):617-625 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01855.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials: the need for complete data.Michael J. Clarke & Lesley A. Stewart - 1995 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1 (2):119-126.
Shortcomings of the randomized controlled trial: a view from the boondocks.Joseph Herman Md - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (4):283-286.
Systematic reviews to support evidence‐based psychiatry: what about schizophrenia?Massimo Morlino, Antonio Calento, Gennaro Pannone, Gianluca Ventrella & Vittorio Schiavone - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1025-1028.
Evidence-based policy: what’s to be done about relevance?: For the 2008 Oberlin Philosophy Colloquium. [REVIEW]Nancy Cartwright - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 143 (1):127 - 136.
How to generalize efficacy results of randomized trials: recommendations based on a systematic review of possible approaches.Piet N. Post, Hans Beer & Gordon H. Guyatt - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):638-643.
A comparison of the scientific quality of publicly and privately funded randomized controlled drug trials.Richard Jones, Stuart Younie, Andrew Macallister & Jim Thornton - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (6):1322-1325.
On the scientific inference from clinical trials.L. Holmberg, M. Baum & H. O. Adami Md - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (2):157-162.
Exercise parameters in the treatment of clinical depression: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Luke G. Perraton, Saravana Kumar & Zuzana Machotka - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):597-604.
Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems.Mary Dixon-Woods, Ray Fitzpatrick & Karen Roberts - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):125-133.
Randomized controlled trials versus rough set analysis: two competing approaches for evaluating clinical data.Tomasz Rzepiński - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (4):271-288.
Opinions of researchers based in the uk on recruiting subjects from developing countries into randomized controlled trials.Sam K. Newton & John Appiah-Poku - 2007 - Developing World Bioethics 7 (3):149–156.
Bias and Conditioning in Sequential medical trials.Cecilia Nardini & Jan Sprenger - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):1053-1064.
Attitudes to evidence in acupuncture: an interview study. [REVIEW]Kirsten Hansen - 2012 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):279-285.
Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (2):119-126.
Riposte to Guest Commentaries on 'Problems associated with randomized controlled clinical trials in breast cancer'.Ann E. Johnson - 1998 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 4 (3):231-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
48 (#332,295)

6 months
6 (#526,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The limitations of randomized controlled trials in predicting effectiveness.Nancy Cartwright & Eileen Munro - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):260-266.
The challenge of evidence in clinical medicine.Mark R. Tonelli - 2010 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):384-389.

Add more references