Scientific naming

Philosophy of Science 25 (3):185-193 (1958)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theory and Practice; Precision and Vagueness. There has long been a conflict between the theory and the practice of scientific naming. The theory expressed both by working scientists and by philosophers has almost always been that precision is an essential part of the scientific attitude and of the procedures and results of science. Theoretically, metaphors have been scorned as belonging to poetry or to philosophy rather than to science. In scientific practice, however, vagueness and metaphor are constantly present; and they are particularly evident at the advancing frontiers of any science, whether mathematical, natural, or social.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Naming of Facts.Achille C. Varzi - 2012 - Analysis 72 (2):322-323.
Naming, and Naming God.Jerome I. Gellman - 1993 - Religious Studies 29 (2):193 - 216.
On naming the colours.A. P. Hazen - 1999 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (2):224-231.
Naming the colours.David Lewis - 1997 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 75 (3):325-42.
Canonical naming systems.Leon Horsten - 2004 - Minds and Machines 15 (2):229-257.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
52 (#305,709)

6 months
1 (#1,467,486)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?