What propositional structure could not be

Synthese 196 (4):1529-1553 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The dominant account of propositions holds that they are structured entities that have, as constituents, the semantic values of the constituents of the sentences that express them. Since such theories hold that propositions are structured, in some sense, like the sentences that express them, they must provide an answer to what I will call Soames’ Question: “What level, or levels, of sentence structure does semantic information incorporate?”. As it turns out, answering Soames’ Question is no easy task. I argue in this paper that the two most promising ways of answering it, the Logical Form Account and the LF Account, are both unsatisfactory. This result casts doubt on the very idea that propositions are structured.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cutting it (too) fine.John Collins - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 169 (2):143-172.
Structured propositions and sentence structure.Jeffrey King - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):495 - 521.
Compositionality and Structured Propositions.Lorraine Juliano Keller & John A. Keller - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):313-323.
The nature and structure of content.Jeffrey C. King - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Should Propositions Proliferate?Bjørn Jespersen - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (4):243-251.
Why it isn't syntax that unifies the proposition.Logan Fletcher - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5-6):590-611.
On fineness of grain.Jeffrey C. King - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):763-781.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-25

Downloads
95 (#181,871)

6 months
16 (#158,534)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lorraine Juliano Keller
Saint Joseph's University of Pennsylvania

Citations of this work

Pure Logic and Higher-order Metaphysics.Christopher Menzel - 2024 - In Peter Fritz & Nicholas K. Jones (eds.), Higher-Order Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Propositions as Structured Cognitive Event‐Types.Wayne A. Davis - 2021 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (3):665-692.
The Functional Composition of Sense.Bryan Pickel - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6917-6942.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Rediscovery of the Mind.John R. Searle - 1992 - MIT Press. Edited by Ned Block & Hilary Putnam.
Semantics in generative grammar.Irene Heim & Angelika Kratzer - 1998 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Angelika Kratzer.
Frege’s Puzzle (2nd edition).Nathan U. Salmon - 1986 - Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Company.
On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.

View all 63 references / Add more references