Screening of Newborns for Disorders with High Benefit-Risk Ratios Should Be Mandatory

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 44 (2):231-240 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Newborn screening has evolved to include an increasingly complex spectrum of diseases, raising concerns that screening should be optional and require parental consent. Early detection of disorders like PKU and MCAD is essential to prevent serious disability and death in affected children. These are examples of high benefit-risk ratio disorders because of the irrefutable health benefits of early detection, coupled with the low risks of treatment. The dire consequences of not diagnosing an infant with a treatable disorder because of parental refusal to screen are wholly unacceptable. Thus, we believe that newborn screening for disorders with high benefit-risk ratios should continue to be mandatory.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Values and Disvalues Underlying Mandatory Screening.Sheila Ruth Hollander - 1991 - Dissertation, The University of Tennessee
Newborn screening: new developments, new dilemmas.N. J. Kerruish - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (7):393-398.
Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?Lainie Friedman Ross - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):299-328.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
22 (#711,593)

6 months
2 (#1,203,746)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?