Darwin and development: Why ontogeny does not recapitulate phylogeny for human concepts

In Denis Mareschal, Paul Quinn & Stephen E. G. Lea (eds.), The Making of Human Concepts. Oxford University Press. pp. 317 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reading development-does ontogeny recapitulate phylogeny.G. Marsh & P. Desberg - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):326-326.
Ontogeny does not always recapitulate phylogeny.Charles T. Snowdon & Jeffrey A. French - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (3):397-398.
The phylogeny and ontogeny of behavior.B. F. Skinner - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):669-677.
The phylogeny fallacy and the ontogeny fallacy.Adam Hochman - 2013 - Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):593-612.
Ontogeny, phylogeny, and scientific development.S. M. Downes - 1999 - In Valerie Gray Hardcastle (ed.), Where Biology Meets Psychology. MIT Press. pp. 273--285.
Prenatal development and the phylogeny and ontogeny of musical behaviour.Richard Parncutt - 2008 - In Susan Hallam, Ian Cross & Michael Thaut (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Music Psychology. Oxford University Press.
Language, tools, and brain revisited.Patricia M. Greenfield - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):159-163.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-01

Downloads
14 (#1,016,720)

6 months
5 (#707,850)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references