- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Opening Statement
Russian Studies in Philosophy 14 (1):6-10 (1975)
Abstract
It has long become established practice, on the part of the editors of Voprosy filosofii, to hold round table discussions on various pressing problems of philosophy and related disciplinesMy notes
Similar books and articles
Reply to Tooley's opening statement.Alvin Plantinga - 2008 - In Knowledge of God. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 151–183.
Statements, components and extensionality.David Rynin - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):153 – 179.
An illocutionary logical explanation of the liar paradox.John T. Kearns - 2007 - History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (1):31-66.
Two Definitions of Lying.James Edwin Mahon - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):211-230.
Is feminist philosophy philosophy?Emanuela Bianchi (ed.) - 1999 - Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.
Analytics
Added to PP
2012-08-27
Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)
6 months
1 (#1,478,830)
2012-08-27
Downloads
8 (#1,325,033)
6 months
1 (#1,478,830)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-qczmr uwo