Pursuing frequency standards and control: the invention of quartz clock technologies

Annals of Science 73 (1):1-39 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe quartz clock, the first to replace the pendulum as the time standard and later a ubiquitous and highly influential technology, originated in research on means for determining frequency for the needs of telecommunication and the interests of its users. This article shows that a few groups in the US, Britain, Italy and the Netherlands developed technologies that enabled the construction of the new clock in 1927–28. To coordinate complex and large communication networks, the monopolistic American Telephone and Telegraph Company, and national laboratories needed to determine and maintain a common ‘standard’ frequency measurement unit. Exploiting novel piezoelectric quartz methods and valve electronics techniques, researchers in these organizations constructed a new crystal-based frequency standard. To ensure its accuracy they compared it to an accepted absolute standard - an astronomical clock, constructing thereby the first quartz clock. Other groups, however, had different, though connected, technological aims, which originated from the diverse interests of the industrial, governmental and academic institutes to which they belonged, and for which they needed to measure, control and manipulate with frequencies of electric oscillations. The present article suggests a comparative examination of the research and development paths of these groups on their incentives, the technological and scientific resources they utilized, and the kind of research carried out in the various institutional settings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Five O'clock Here.Lyle E. Angene - 1982 - Analysis 42 (2):78 - 79.
Five O'clock on the Sun.J. L. Mackie - 1980 - Analysis 41 (3):113 - 114.
The light clock: Error and implications. [REVIEW]Richard Schlegel - 1980 - Foundations of Physics 10 (3-4):345-351.
How Not To Use the Church-Turing Thesis Against Platonism.R. Urbaniak - 2011 - Philosophia Mathematica 19 (1):74-89.
Massive Modularity and Brain Evolution.Edouard Machery - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):825-838.
Light Clocks and the Clock Hypothesis.Samuel C. Fletcher - 2013 - Foundations of Physics 43 (11):1369-1383.
Deontology and doxastic control.Nicholas Tebben - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2835-2847.
Representing the Object of Controversy: The Case of the Molecular Clock.Michael R. Dietrich - 2007 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 29 (2):161 - 176.
Variations in cross-masking with frequency.J. G. Ingham - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (3):199.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-03

Downloads
10 (#1,217,423)

6 months
4 (#855,130)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references