On the Difficulty of Writing Out formal Proofs in Arithmetic

Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (3):328-332 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Let ℸ be the set of Gödel numbers Gn of function symbols f such that PRA ⊢ and let γ be the function such that equation imageWe prove: The r. e. set ℸ is m-complete; the function γ is not primitive recursive in any class of functions {f1, f2, ⃛} so long as each fi has a recursive upper bound. This implies that γ is not primitive recursive in ℸ although it is recursive in ℸ

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-03

Downloads
18 (#835,016)

6 months
6 (#526,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Classical recursion theory: the theory of functions and sets of natural numbers.Piergiorgio Odifreddi - 1989 - New York, N.Y., USA: Sole distributors for the USA and Canada, Elsevier Science Pub. Co..
Classical Recursion Theory.Peter G. Hinman - 2001 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):71-73.
Self-Reference and Modal Logic.George Boolos & C. Smorynski - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (1):306.
Self-Reference and Modal Logic.[author unknown] - 1987 - Studia Logica 46 (4):395-398.
Effective Nonrecursiveness.Takeshi Yamaguchi - 1997 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 43 (1):45-48.

Add more references