Contingent capture of involuntary visual attention interferes with detection of auditory stimuli

&
Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00528

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Perceptual load influences auditory space perception in the ventriloquist aftereffect.Ranmalee Eramudugolla, Marc R. Kamke, Salvador Soto-Faraco & Jason B. Mattingley - 2011 - Cognition 118 (1):62-74.
What we see: Inattention and the capture of attention by meaning.Arien Mack, Zissis Pappas, Michael E. Silverman & Robin Gay - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):488-506.
Better safe than sorry: Simplistic fear-relevant stimuli capture attention.Sarah J. Forbes, Helena M. Purkis & Ottmar V. Lipp - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (5):794-804.
An experimental study of the pairing of certain auditory and visual stimuli.J. T. Cowles - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (4):461.
Effects of previously associated annoying stimuli (auditory) on visual recognition thresholds.Julian Hochberg & Virginia Brooks - 1958 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (5):490.
Effects of simultaneous auditory stimulation on the detection of tactile stimuli.George A. Gescheider, William G. Barton, Michael R. Bruce, Jeffrey H. Goldberg & Michael J. Greenspan - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):120.
Towards a cognitive model of distraction by auditory novelty: The role of involuntary attention capture and semantic processing.Fabrice B. R. Parmentier - 2008 - Cognition 109 (3):345-362.
Vigilance in the detection of low-intensity visual stimuli.Jack A. Adams - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (3):204.
Involuntary capture of spatial attention is contingent on control settings.C. L. Folk, J. C. Johnston & R. W. Remington - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):514-514.
Independence between implicit and explicit processing as revealed by the Simon effect.Shih-Yu Lo & Su-Ling Yeh - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):523-533.
Intersensory versus intrasensory contingent information processing.Ira H. Bernstein, Ned N. Pederson & Donald L. Schurman - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 94 (2):156.
Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals.Sydney J. Segal & Vincent Fusella - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 83 (3p1):458.
Change Detection.Ronald A. Rensink - 2002 - Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1):245-277.
Divided attention to visual and auditory-stimuli.Er Hafter & Am Bonnel - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):485-485.
Effect of certain noises upon detection of visual signals.William H. Watkins - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (1):72.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
12 (#1,090,149)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Prejudice as the misattribution of salience.Jessie Munton - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy 64 (1):1-19.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Unconscious activation of task sets.Heiko Reuss, Andrea Kiesel, Wilfried Kunde & Bernhard Hommel - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (3):556-567.

Add more references