Is Hume a causal realist?

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 11 (3):509 – 520 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a review essay of Richman and Read (eds.) _The New Hume Debate (London: Routledge, 2000). The essay is highly critical of how the debate concerning whether Hume is a causal realist is presently conceived by its opponents, and argues in favour of a _New Hume position

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/0960878032000119709

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Causation and Intelligibility.David H. Sanford - 1994 - Philosophy 69 (267):55 - 67.
What can causal claims mean?Walter Ott - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (3):459-470.
Conceivability and modality in Hume: A lemma in an argument in defense of skeptical realism.Peter Kail - 2003 - Hume Studies 29 (1):43--61.
Hume, causal realism, and causal science.Peter Millican - 2009 - Mind 118 (471):647-712.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
101 (#173,255)

6 months
5 (#647,370)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Kail
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Liberté et nécessité chez Hume.Benoît Gide - 2023 - Archives de Philosophie 86 (3):47-70.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references