Just War Theory and Cyber-Attacks

In Not Just Wars (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this chapter, I take up the question of whether one of the central principles of jus ad bellum – just cause – is relevant in a world in which cyberattacks occur. I argue that this principle is just as relevant as ever, though it needs modification in light of recent developments. In particular, I argue, contrary to many traditional just war theorists, that just cause should not be limited to physical attacks. In the process, I offer an improved definition of cyberattack and show how some other principles of jus ad bellum constrain this widened notion of just cause.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,574

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
Kant's ethics of war and peace.Brian Orend - 2004 - Journal of Military Ethics 3 (2):161-177.
Order and Affray: Defensive Privileges in Warfare.Toby Handfield & Patrick Emerton - 2009 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 37 (4):382 - 414.
After war ends: a philosophical perspective.Larry May - 2012 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Skepticism about Jus Post Bellum.Seth Lazar - 2012 - In Larry May & Andrew Forcehimes (eds.), Morality, Jus Post Bellum, and International Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 204-222.
The Incoherence of Walzer’s Just War Theory.Graham Parsons - 2012 - Social Theory and Practice 38 (4):663-88.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-05-25

Downloads
90 (#191,320)

6 months
9 (#320,673)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Leonard Kahn
Loyola University, New Orleans

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references