A Logical Theory for Conditional Weak Ontic Necessity Based on Context Update

Journal of Logic, Language and Information 32 (5):777-807 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Weak ontic necessity is the ontic necessity expressed by “should/ought to” in English. An example of it is “I should be dead by now”. A feature of this necessity is that whether it holds at the present world is irrelevant to whether its prejacent holds at the present world. In this paper, by combining premise semantics and update semantics for conditionals, we present a logical theory for conditional weak ontic necessity based on context update. A context is a set of ordered defaults, determining expected possible states of the present world. Sentences are evaluated with respect to contexts. When evaluating the conditional weak ontic necessity with respect to a context, we first update the context with the antecedent, then check whether the consequent holds with respect to the updated context. We compare this theory to some related works. The logic’s expressivity is studied.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A History Based Logic for Dynamic Preference Updates.Can Başkent & Guy McCusker - 2020 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 29 (3):275-305.
Public Announcements, Public Lies and Recoveries.Kai Li & Jan van Eijck - 2022 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 31 (3):423-450.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2003 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (4):537-543.
Contents of Volume 13.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (4):537-539.
Contents of Volume 9.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):521-523.
Upcoming Themes.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (3):393-393.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2003 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12 (1):119-125.
Call for Papers.[author unknown] - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (1):135-136.
Call for Papers.[author unknown] - 1999 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 8 (3):399-400.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (4):531-537.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):523-529.
Call for Papers.[author unknown] - 1998 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7 (4):519-520.
Contents of Volume 10.[author unknown] - 2001 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10 (4):527-529.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (4):541-546.
Instructions for Authors.[author unknown] - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (4):525-531.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-22

Downloads
14 (#994,498)

6 months
7 (#438,648)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Philosophy of Science 42 (3):341-344.
Defaults in update semantics.Frank Veltman - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (3):221 - 261.
The problem of counterfactual conditionals.Nelson Goodman - 1947 - Journal of Philosophy 44 (5):113-128.

View all 20 references / Add more references