Notes on Quintilian And [Quintilian]

Classical Quarterly 38 (02):568- (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The answer to the basic question, quisquamne cantat?, given the rhetoric of the context , especially emotive in 57, should be that everyone cantat, but the form of the question seems to suggest, at first sight, the opposite

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Quintilian and the Pedagogy of Argument.Michael Mendelson - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):277-294.
Notes on Quintilian.Charles E. Murgia - 1991 - Classical Quarterly 41 (01):183-.
Notes on Quintilian.Emory B. Lease - 1899 - The Classical Review 13 (02):130-.
Quintilian, Plutarch, and the Early Humanists.W. H. S. Jones - 1907 - The Classical Review 21 (02):33-43.
Quintilian 6.3.15—16.M. L. Clarke - 1977 - Classical Quarterly 27 (02):468-.
Quintilian I.F. R. D. Goodyear - 1977 - The Classical Review 27 (02):191-.
Quintilian II–V.F. R. D. Goodyear - 1979 - The Classical Review 29 (01):66-.
Quintilian.F. R. D. Goodyear - 1973 - The Classical Review 23 (01):37-.
Quintilian 12.11.11–12.Michael Winterbottom - 2006 - Classical Quarterly 56 (01):324-.
A Crux in Quintilian.R. G. Lewis - 1961 - The Classical Review 11 (03):204-205.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-09

Downloads
4 (#1,627,781)

6 months
1 (#1,477,342)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references