Germ-line Genetic Engineering: A Critical Look at Magisterial Catholic Teaching

Christian Bioethics 18 (2):126-144 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is written from within the Catholic, and more particularly the Augustinian/Thomist tradition of moral theology. It analyses the response of the Catholic Magisterium to the prospect of germline-genetic engineering (GGE). This is a very new issue and the Church has little definitive teaching on it. The statements of Popes and Vatican congregations or commissions have not settled the key questions. An analysis of theological themes drawn from secular writers points beyond pragmatic safety considerations toward intrinsic ethical limits to GGE. Given the impossibility of identifying would-have-been-created persons who would be “treated” by this intervention, altering the human genome for the sake of future generations cannot be regarded as “therapy.” Further theological considerations suggest that GGE may not be morally permissible, even in the case of identifiable genetic diseases. This is an area where more theological reflection is needed

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Seeking perfection: A Kantian look at human genetic engineering.Martin Gunderson - 2007 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28 (2):87-102.
The Catholic Position on Germ Line Genetic Engineering.James J. Delaney - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):33-34.
Germ-line genetic enhancement and Rawlsian primary goods.Fritz Allhoff - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (1):39-56.
Ethical issues in manipulating the human germ line.Marc Lappé - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):621-639.
Human Gene therapy: Scientific and ethical considerations.W. French Anderson - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):275-292.
Human germ-line therapy: The case for its development and use.Burke K. Zimmerman - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (6):593-612.
Human Gene therapy: Why draw a line?W. French Anderson - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):681-693.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-25

Downloads
91 (#188,991)

6 months
9 (#317,373)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Albert Jones
Anscombe Bioethics Centre

References found in this work

Wrongful life: Paradoxes in the morality of causing people to exist.Jeff McMahan - 1998 - In Jules L. Coleman, Christopher W. Morris & Gregory S. Kavka (eds.), Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208--47.
Future People, Disability and Screening.Jonathan Glover - 2001 - In John Harris (ed.), Bioethics. Oxford University Press.
Seven Traits for the Future.Alasdair Macintyre - 1979 - Hastings Center Report 9 (1):5-7.
The Catholic Position on Germ Line Genetic Engineering.James J. Delaney - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):33-34.
Ethics and Human-Animal Transgenesis.Nicholas Tonti-Filippini, John I. Fleming, Gregory K. Pike & Ray Campbell - 2006 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 6 (4):689-704.

Add more references