Are locus equations sufficient or necessary for obstruent perception?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):271-272 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Two issues are addressed in this commentary: the universality and the “psychological reality” of locus equations as cues to place of articulation. Preliminary data collected in our laboratory suggest that locus equations do not reliably distinguish place of articulation for fricatives. Additionally, perception studies show that listeners can identify place of articulation based on much less temporal information than that required for deriving locus equations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Revising locus of the bridge between neuroscience and perception.L. W. Hahn - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (6):759-760.
Acoustic correlates and perceptual cues in speech.James R. Sawusch - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):283-284.
Locus equations reveal learnability.Keith R. Kluender - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):273-274.
Locus equations in models of human classification behavior.Roel Smits - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):284-285.
An articulatory perspective on the locus equation.Björn Lindblom - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):274-275.
Locus equations and pattern recognition.Terrance M. Nearey - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):277-277.
A phonological perspective on locus equations.William J. Idsardi - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):270-271.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#1,010,248)

6 months
7 (#478,520)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references