Reframing AI Discourse

Minds and Machines 27 (4):575-590 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A critically important ethical issue facing the AI research community is how AI research and AI products can be responsibly conceptualised and presented to the public. A good deal of fear and concern about uncontrollable AI is now being displayed in public discourse. Public understanding of AI is being shaped in a way that may ultimately impede AI research. The public discourse as well as discourse among AI researchers leads to at least two problems: a confusion about the notion of ‘autonomy’ that induces people to attribute to machines something comparable to human autonomy, and a ‘sociotechnical blindness’ that hides the essential role played by humans at every stage of the design and deployment of an AI system. Here our purpose is to develop and use a language with the aim to reframe the discourse in AI and shed light on the real issues in the discipline.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Bioethics as Public Discourse and Second-Order Discipline.L. M. Kopelman - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (3):261-273.
The puzzle of free indirect discourse.Yael Sharvit - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3):353-395.
Religion and Bioethics: Can We Talk? [REVIEW]William E. Stempsey - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):339-350.
Moral Grandstanding.Justin Tosi & Brandon Warmke - 2016 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 44 (3):197-217.
religion And humanity.Arne Grøn - 2008 - Florida Philosophical Review 8 (1):1-12.
Fictional States of Affairs and Literary Discourse.Peter McCormick - 1983 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 19 (1):163-178.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-01-09

Downloads
153 (#124,568)

6 months
43 (#95,132)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?