Hinge Epistemology, Radical Skepticism, and Domain Specific Skepticism

International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (2):116-133 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper explores how hinge epistemology might fruitfully be applied not only to the problem of radical skepticism, but also to certain domain specific skepticisms, and in particular, moral skepticism. The paper explains the idea of a domain specific skepticism, and how domain specific skepticisms contrast with radical skepticism. I argue that a domain specific skeptical problem can be resolved in just the same way as radical skepticism, if there are hinge commitments within that domain. I then suggest that there are hinge commitments in the moral domain, and use this to address a moral skeptical problem due to our apparent inability to know moral nihilism to be false.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Skepticism, Metaphors and Vertigo.Rico Gutschmidt - 2016 - Wittgenstein-Studien 7 (1):131-147.
The impossibility of local skepticism.Stephen Maitzen - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Exuberant skepticism.Paul Kurtz - 2010 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books. Edited by John R. Shook.
On the Nature of Hinge Commitments.Eros Carvalho - 2019 - Sképsis 10 (19):55-66.
1% Skepticism.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2017 - Noûs 51 (2):271-290.
Hinge Propositions, Skeptical Dogmatism, and External World Disjunctivism.Mark Walker - 2019 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 9 (2):134-167.
Wittgensteinian Epistemology and Cartesian Skepticism.Nicola Claudio Salvatore - 2015 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):53-80.
On What Does Rationality Hinge?Yuval Avnur - 2017 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 7 (4):246-257.
Duncan Pritchard’s Epistemic Angst.John Greco - 2018 - International Journal for the Study of Skepticism 8 (1):51-61.
How to Undercut Radical Skepticism.Santiago Echeverri - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (5):1299-1321.
Should There Be a Moral Epistemology?Todd Martin Stewart - 2002 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-07-02

Downloads
506 (#37,304)

6 months
182 (#16,196)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Drew Johnson
University of Oslo

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Truth as one and many.Michael P. Lynch - 2009 - New York : Clarendon Press,: Clarendon Press.
Moral skepticisms.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2006 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free)?Crispin Wright - 2004 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 78 (1):167–212.

View all 13 references / Add more references