Revolution or Reform in Human Subjects Research Oversight

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):922-929 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The contemporary system of prospective oversight of human subjects research has been criticized as inefficient and ineffective. Plausible approaches to research oversight range from no prospective review, to review-and-comment, to the current review-and-approve regime. Articulating this spectrum offers an opportunity to consider systematically the strengths and disadvantages of each

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reflections on Governance Models for the Clinical Translation of Stem Cells.Jeremy Sugarman - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):251-256.
New Rules for Research with Human Participants?Jessica Berg & Nicole Deming - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (6):10-11.
Federal oversight and regulation of human subjects research---an update.Carol Mason Spicer - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (3):261-264.
The ethics and politics of human experimentation.Paul Murray McNeill - 1993 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Responsible conduct of research.Adil E. Shamoo - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by David B. Resnik.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-03-01

Downloads
178 (#110,430)

6 months
9 (#313,570)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?