Embodiment versus memetics

Mind and Society 7 (1):77-94 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The term embodiment identifies a theory that meaning and semantics cannot be captured by abstract, logical systems, but are dependent on an agent’s experience derived from being situated in an environment. This theory has recently received a great deal of support in the cognitive science literature and is having significant impact in artificial intelligence. Memetics refers to the theory that knowledge and ideas can evolve more or less independently of their human-agent substrates. While humans provide the medium for this evolution, memetics holds that ideas can be developed without human comprehension or deliberate interference. Both theories have profound implications for the study of language—its potential use by machines, its acquisition by children and of particular relevance to this special issue, its evolution. This article links the theory of memetics to the established literature on semantic space, then examines the extent to which these memetic mechanisms might account for language independently of embodiment. It then seeks to explain the evolution of language through uniquely human cognitive capacities which facilitate memetic evolution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Embodiment in language-based memory: Some qualifications.Manuel de Vega - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):22-23.
The Case for Memes.Matt Gers - 2008 - Biological Theory 3 (4):305-315.
Imitation Makes Us Human.Susan Blackmore - 2007 - In Charles Pasternak (ed.), What Makes Us Human? ONEWorld Publications. pp. 1-16.
Who is mind blind?Nicholas Nicastro - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):745-746.
Memetics and money.Keith E. Stanovich - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):194-195.
Memetics does provide a useful way of understanding cultural evolution.Susan Blackmore - 2010 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of biology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 255--272.
Implications for memetics.Susan Blackmore - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):490-490.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-10

Downloads
59 (#278,574)

6 months
10 (#308,281)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?