Vertical/compatible integration versus analogizing with biology

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):348-349 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Vertical/compatible theoretical integration provides an alternative way of unifying sociocultural anthropology and related disciplines. It involves analyzing theoretical statements for their implicit and explicit assumptions at multiple levels of analysis and then determining whether these assumptions are compatible with consensus in the relevant disciplines (e.g., does the sociological theory include an assumption at odds with consensus psychology?). Incompatibilities indicate a need for further research. This approach is much more likely to salvage the bulk of humanities-oriented anthropology than is that of the authors. (Published Online November 9 2006).

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Flexible feature creation: Child's play?Gedeon Deák - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):23-23.
Navigation bicoded as functions of x-y and time?James G. Phillips & Rowan P. Ogeil - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (5):561-562.
Let's cooperate to understand cooperation.John Lazarus - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (2):169-170.
Cultural traits and cultural integration.R. Lee Lyman - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):357-358.
Rationality versus program-based behavior.Geoffrey M. Hodgson - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (1):29-30.
Correlating mind and body.T. J. Lioyd-Jones, N. Donnelly & B. Weekes - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (4):688-688.
Darwinian cultural evolution rivals genetic evolution.Mark Pagel - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):360-360.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
21 (#761,941)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?