A Right to Strike?

Nursing Ethics 4 (4):277-282 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During 1995, there was a major shift in the United Kingdom in the debate of whether it is right for nurses to strike. The Royal College of Nursing, the former advocate of a non-industrial action policy, moved towards the UNISON position that industrial action is ethical in some circumstances, as well as the necessary thing to do. The authors, both nurses and UNISON officials, look at the reasons for this change and why UNISON’s historical position sees industrial action as an effective weapon in defending services, as well as wages and jobs. It can be right to strike.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A right to strike?K. Jennings & G. Western - 1997 - Nursing Ethics 4 (4):277-282.
Ethical issues associated with sheep fly strike research, prevention, and control.Michael C. Morris - 2000 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):205-217.
The 1980 Polish Strike and the Strike Cycles in the 1970s.R. Damus - 1981 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1981 (47):104-110.
Should Doctors strike?John J. Park & Scott A. Murray - 2014 - Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (5):341-342.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
18 (#838,762)

6 months
6 (#531,855)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references