Life Sciences and Moral Education (Translation from German by Ganna Hubenko)

Filosofiya osvity Philosophy of Education 19 (2):218-220 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The author considers ethical obligations in relation to all living beings. As a result, he formulates the guiding principle of our actions - a bioethical imperative «Respect each living being as an end in itself and, if possible, treat it, as yourself». Based on this principle, you can pedagogically influence morality with the help of various scientific disciplines.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Models Integrative Bioethics in Different Countries.Anna Hubenko - 2016 - Філософія Освіти 19 (2):206-217.
The 'voice of care': Implications for bioethical education.Alisa L. Carse - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (1):5-28.
Moral Philosophy and moral education.Thora Ilin Bayer - 2017 - Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books.
The education of the categorical imperative.James Scott Johnston - 2006 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 25 (5-6):385-402.
Der Sinn des Lebens und das gute Leben.Roland Kipke - 2014 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 68 (2):180-202.
The Role of Bioethics Education in Catholic Higher Education.Marie T. Hilliard - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (4):705-734.
The Rationale of Moral Education.Hardy E. Jones - 1974 - The Monist 58 (4):659-673.
The Rationale of Moral Education.Hardy E. Jones - 1974 - The Monist 58 (4):659-673.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-10

Downloads
8 (#1,336,005)

6 months
5 (#694,978)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references