What's the Difference? Knowledge and Gender in (Post) Modern Philosophy of Religion

Religious Studies 32 (4):431 - 448 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although there is a deep channel dividing British philosophy of religion from French thought associated with poststructuralism, much is to be gained from communication between the two. In this paper I explore three central areas of difference: the understanding of the subject, of language, and of God/religion. In each case I show that continental philosophy pursues these areas in ways which make issues of gender central to their understanding; and suggest that, while continental thought is neither monolithic nor beyond criticism, its understandings of difference are of great value to religious thought.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Divine subjectivity: understanding Hegel's philosophy of religion.Dale M. Schlitt - 1990 - [Scranton, PA]: University of Scranton Press.
The Puzzle of Petitionary Prayer.Daniel Howard-Snyder & Frances Howard-Snyder - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (2):43-68.
A phenomenology of gender.Johanna Oksala - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 39 (3):229-244.
The ethics of gender.Susan Frank Parsons - 2001 - Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
33 (#485,976)

6 months
1 (#1,475,085)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references