Bioethics, Conflicts of Interest, the Limits of Transparency

Hastings Center Report 33 (4):40-43 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The movement in bioethics toward disclosure of financial conflicts of interest is well and good, most of the time. But in some cases, disclosure is not only unnecessary but destructive. When bioethicists advance arguments whose premises and logical moves are open to scrutiny, disclosure—far from clearing the air of bias—introduces bias.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The troublesome semantics of conflict of interest.Paul J. Friedman - 1992 - Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):245 – 251.
Addressing Within-Role Conflicts of Interest in Surgery.Wendy A. Rogers & Jane Johnson - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):219-225.
Conflicts of interest in science.David B. Resnik - 1998 - Perspectives on Science 6 (4):381-408.
Conflict of interest: the importance of potential. [REVIEW]Dr Imogen Evans - 2002 - Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3):393-396.
Science in the Sunshine: Transparency of Financial Conflicts of Interest.Sheldon Krimsky - 2010 - Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine 1 (4):273-284.
The Greening of Bioethics: Corporate Funding of Bioethics Research.Leigh Turner - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (3):326-328.
Conflicts of interest.Thomas L. Carson - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (5):387 - 404.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
20 (#769,678)

6 months
6 (#526,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Daniel Sulmasy
Georgetown University

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references