Humpty Dumpty and the “Sneaky O” Proposition

New Scholasticism 45 (4):590-599 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is humpty dumpty vindicated?Gershon Weiler - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):278 – 281.
James Joyce and Humpty Dumpty.Donald Davidson - 1989 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 16 (1):1-12.
Putting humpty dumpty together again.Keith S. Donnellan - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (2):203-215.
Mr. Donnellan and humpty dumpty on referring.Alfred F. MacKay - 1968 - Philosophical Review 77 (2):197-202.
Humpty dumpty and verbal meaning.Michael Hancher - 1981 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1):49-58.
Sham reasoning, Humpty Dumpty, and the burden of proof.Fiona J. Hibberd - 2009 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 29 (2):91-96.
Vindication of the humpty dumpty attitude towards language.Herman Tennesen - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):185 – 198.
A plea for pragmatics.Jonas Åkerman - 2009 - Synthese 170 (1):155 - 167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
32 (#502,492)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Lire et Délire.Roland Houde - 1972 - Dialogue 11 (1):78-85.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references