- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Classifying Conditionals II
Analysis 51 (3):137 - 143 (1991)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Classifying conditionals: The traditional way is right.Jonathan Bennett - 1995 - Mind 104 (414):331-354.
Classifying ‘conditionals’: The traditional way is wrong.V. H. Dudman - 2000 - Analysis 60 (2):147–147.
Conditionals, Literal Content, and 'DeRose's Thesis': A Reply to Barnett.K. DeRose - 2012 - Mind 121 (482):443-455.
Subjunctive biscuit and stand-off conditionals.Eric Swanson - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (3):637-648.
Defending a possible-worlds account of indicative conditionals.Daniel Nolan - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (3):215-269.
Doesn't-will and didn't-did.Charles B. Cross - 2002 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 80 (1):101 – 106.
Analytics
Added to PP
2011-05-29
Downloads
79 (#215,453)
6 months
2 (#1,250,897)
2011-05-29
Downloads
79 (#215,453)
6 months
2 (#1,250,897)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-8fb5884b9-g9g5w uwo