Why Globalize the Curriculum?

In Melissa S. Williams (ed.), Deparochializing Political Theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. pp. 273-290 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a world no longer centered on the West, what should political theory become? Although Western intellectual traditions continue to dominate academic journals and course syllabi in political theory, up-and-coming contributions of “comparative political theory” are rapidly transforming the field. Deparochializing Political Theory creates a space for conversation among leading scholars who differ widely in their approaches to political theory. These scholars converge on the belief that we bear a collective responsibility to engage and support the transformation of political theory. In these exchanges, “deparochializing” political theory emerges as an intellectual, educational, and political practice that cuts across methodological approaches. Because it is also an intergenerational project, this book presses us to reimagine our teaching and curriculum design. Bearing the marks of its beginnings in East Asia, Deparochializing Political Theory seeks to decenter Western thought and explore the evolving tasks of political theory in an age of global modernity.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deparochializing Political Theory.Melissa S. Williams (ed.) - 2020 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
What is political theory?Stephen K. White & J. Donald Moon (eds.) - 2004 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.
The Methodology of Political Theory.Christian List & Laura Valentini - 2016 - In Herman Cappelen, Tamar Gendler & John P. Hawthorne (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
Democracy, pluralism and political theory.William E. Connolly - 2007 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Edited by Samuel Allen Chambers & Terrell Carver.
Abating contingency: Michael Oakeshott’s political pluralism.Sungmoon Kim - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (3):267-288.
Democracy, pluralism and political theory.William E. Connolly - 2007 - New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Edited by Samuel Allen Chambers & Terrell Carver.
Towards a more plural political theory of pluralism.Corrado Fumagalli - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 47 (10):1154-1175.
Handbook of political theory.Gerald F. Gaus & Chandran Kukathas (eds.) - 2004 - Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-07-17

Downloads
389 (#51,568)

6 months
82 (#57,502)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Duncan Ivison
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references